Standaard Boekhandel gebruikt cookies en gelijkaardige technologieën om de website goed te laten werken en je een betere surfervaring te bezorgen.
Hieronder kan je kiezen welke cookies je wilt inschakelen:
Technische en functionele cookies
Deze cookies zijn essentieel om de website goed te laten functioneren, en laten je toe om bijvoorbeeld in te loggen. Je kan deze cookies niet uitschakelen.
Analytische cookies
Deze cookies verzamelen anonieme informatie over het gebruik van onze website. Op die manier kunnen we de website beter afstemmen op de behoeften van de gebruikers.
Marketingcookies
Deze cookies delen je gedrag op onze website met externe partijen, zodat je op externe platformen relevantere advertenties van Standaard Boekhandel te zien krijgt.
Je kan maximaal 250 producten tegelijk aan je winkelmandje toevoegen. Verwijdere enkele producten uit je winkelmandje, of splits je bestelling op in meerdere bestellingen.
The original human being isn't just "overhauled", i. e., reconditioned but rather openly, i. e., officially and obstructively "replaced by a completely different cast bearing a mark of shame". One proclaims, "now it turns out, the one blamed has been 'quite different' from the beginning". The denouncer's accusatory proceedings virtually emulate a transformation of his counterparty's truthful character into a morally reprehensible one. Literally, "the person concerned" is not just to become an 'object' but an entirely "new 'thing' in the eyes of his accusatory beholders". (..)If the indictment was to be absolutely effective, the according scheme should not permit the society of public bystanders, panel of selectees or committee of jurors to choose their positions at will. Instead, the prosecutor's optional choices are solely to hint at the one and only preferrable alternative in terms of the prosecutor's "'morally required' verdict".Publicly, the prosecutor's individual performance and personal presentation is to synchronise with his course of accusational proceedings - not in the sense of a private individual - but by means of priming the public to be viewing him as a "publicly known" and "honourable person" bearing the people's, i. e., the "nation's power of attorney". In this unique context of "moral authority", the arraigner assumes a "chief prosecutor's", i. e., "state attorney's" mandate on "rightfully and justifiably operating in the people's name".At last, the "wicked 'thing'" is to be ritually removed from his place in a legitimate order, i.e., 'it' must be defined as if "'it' could've never fitted society". Particularly, courts and their officials own somewhat of a monopoly over such ceremonies of degradation infamously labelled "show trials" having also become a doubtful, professional as much as a political routine in democratic, pseudo-democratic and explicitly totalitarian countries.(H. Garfinkel, Deviant Behaviour & Social Response)