Table of Cases Reported; I. Decisions of International Tribunals: Proposed Amendments to the Naturalisation Provisions of the Political Constitution of Costa Rico (Advisory Opinion OC-4/84) [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] (1984), Enforceability of the Right to Reply or Correction (Articles 14(1), 1(1) and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights) (Advisory Opinion OC-7/85) [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] (1986), Word 'Laws' in Article 30 of the American Convention on Human Rights, The (Advisory Opinion OC-6/86) [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] (1986), Almeida de Quinteros and Quinteros almeida v. Uruguay (Communication No R24/107) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Almirati Nieto v. Uruguay (Communication No R23/92) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Drescher Caldas v. Uruguay (Communication No R10/43) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Estradet Cabreira v. Uruguay (Communication No R24/105) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Luyeye Magana v. Zaire (Communication No R22/90) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Martínez Machado v. Uruguay (Communication No R20/83) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Oxandabarat v. Uruguay (Communication No R24/103) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), Varela Nuñez v. Uruguay (Communication No R25/108) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1983), AD v. Canada (Communication No R19/78) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Alfredo Romero v. Uruguay (Communication No R21/85) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), association for the Defence of the Rights of Disabled and Handicapped Persons in Italy and Others v. Italy (Communication No 163/1984) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Gómez de Voituret v. Uruguay (Communication No 25/109) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), JK v. Canada (Communication No 174/1984) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), MA v. Italy (Communication No 117/1981) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Manera Lluberas v. Uruguay (Communication No R26/123) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), MF v. The Netherlands (Communication No 173/1984) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Muteba v. Zaire (Communication No R26/124) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), OF v. Norway (Communication 158/1983) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984), Viana Acosta v. Uruguay (Communication No R25/110) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] (1984); II. Decisions of Municipal Courts: In re Musisi [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bugdaycay [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Navaratnam [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Norman [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Santis [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Sivakumaran [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Vaithialingam [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Vathanan and Another [England] (1987), Regina v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Vilvarajah [England] (1987), McGlinchey v. Wren [Ireland] (1982), McMahon v. Leahy and the Governor of Mountjoy Prison [Ireland] (1983), McMahon v. Leahy and the Governor of Mountjoy Prison [Ireland] (1984), Quinn v. Wren [Ireland] (1984), Shannon v. Fenning [Ireland] (1984), Shannon v. The Attorney-General and Ireland [Ireland] (1984), Quinn v. Wren [Ireland] (1985), Harte v. Fanning [Ireland] (1987), Harte v. Fanning and District Justice Mahon [Ireland] (1987), Russell v. Fanning [Ireland] (1988), Russell v. Governor of Portlaoise Prison, Fanning, and the Attorney-G

Specificaties